Cannabis treats prostate cancer, study finds

cannabis.jpg  Following the growing interest in medical benefits of cannabis, a new study finds that the compound can help fight prostate cancer.

According to the study published in the British Journal of Cancer, chemicals found in cannabis can stop prostate cancer cells from growing in the laboratory.

Its active chemicals known as cannabinoids — methanandamide and JWH-015 — are also reported to be effective in reducing the size of the tumor in mice.

The compound is believed to block CB2 receptors on the surface of the cancerous tissue, preventing the division and growth of the tumor cells. It is reported to be more effective in treating aggressive prostate cancer cell types, which do not respond to existing hormone treatments.

Scientists hope that cannabis-based medicines could help fight prostate cancer in the near future.

They, however, stressed that an individual should not start smoking cannabis with the aim of fighting the disease as its use is associated with psychotropic effects.

Source: http://www.presstv.ir/detail.aspx?id=103946&sectionid=3510210

Anyone notice Rubicon up 10% on huge volume ?

rmx.jpg

Nice Chart !

Nichols Flipping

Fractal Gold Report for August 20, 2009

By David Nichols
dnichols@fractalpublishing.com

It was a mildly encouraging day for gold on Wednesday, as prices essentially stayed the whole day around the $944 energy level, but it’s still going to take some more work to really improve this current set-up.

The thing that is most worrisome right now is the way that the current bounce looks exactly like the previous failed test up to $960. Gold could be “stair-stepping” its way down to lower levels right here, or at least setting up for one more serious breakdown into Day 30 on Friday.

This is why I have been recommending an exit out of long trading positions around this critical $944 level, as it’s still very much an open question whether gold will pop back over this level.

Gold is definitely doing the right things now to build a lasting reversal pattern off $936 — also an important level over the last few months — but it has to actually get comfortably over $944 before we can believe it.

The 150-minute chart is fully consolidated, as gold has been in rebound mode for 2 full trading days, and it generally only takes one full trading day to accomplish this. So there is energy for a bigger move over the next day or two, but it’s just too hard to predict the short-term direction at this stage of the timing cycle, with this type of pattern.

So the answer here — as is typical — is to let the gold market itself tell us what it’s likely to do. The easiest way to analyze this is to look for a strong break up or down, which starts a trend on the 150-minute chart, or even the daily chart.

One scenario that could be quite good for a favorable re-entry would be a sudden dip down into the $920s, where a very strong slingshot rebound should quickly develop. Such a down-then-up move would leave a long “tail” behind on the daily candle, indicating that gold survived a hard test and is likely to rocket back to the upside.

Such a tail would also test the obvious lower boundary line on the triangle consolidation developing on the weekly chart.

nichols.gif

The weekly chart of gold looks to be mired in a long-term consolidation pattern, as it oscillates in progressively smaller moves after the February top at $1,007. This is not a bad thing in this situation, as it is a great way to energize a market ahead of a super-strong breakout, but it can be frustrating in real-time waiting for a market to get ready like this on such a big time-frame.

Interestingly, the apex of this weekly triangle is pointing to the time right around September 10th as the moment of maximum equilibrium, as gold will have oscillated to a near-standstill by that day if it keeps up this pattern. This is also right at Day 43 of the timing cycle that launched on July 10th.

So it’s looking more and more like gold will oscillate in smaller moves until right around Day 43 on Sep. 10th, and then it will finally be ready to charge higher and break over $990.

You Might Be a Goldbug

thereformedbroker.com/2009/08/18/you-might-be-a-gold-bug/

Richard Russell

Richard Russell last evening…

Question — Russell, why do you despise fiat money?

Answer — Here’s why — I’ve worked hard all my life. In 1971, Nixon refused to pay off America’s international debts with gold as per international agreement. The world reluctantly accepted Nixon’s cop-out , and nations went totally off the gold standard and on to fiat money.

Let’s say I work all my life for a total of $3 million. The Federal Reserve, by a simple computer computation, can “create” a billion dollars (actually Federal Reserve Notes) in a few seconds. The fact is that a bunch of central bankers can create, with no sweat, no work, no thinking, a billion dollars, while I have to sweat and work all my life for a fraction of what the Fed can create in a matter of seconds? I say it’s unethical, it’s illogical and it’s absolutely immoral.

The Fed has had a policy of producing 2% inflation every year regardless of what’s happening in the economy. Increase the money supply 2% a year for every year since World War II and what do you have? Over time, you have a massive increase in prices known as asset inflation.

Consumer Buying constitutes roughly 70% of the nation’s Gross Domestic Product. But trees don’t grow to the sky and neither to green shoots. Suddenly with the new “globalization,” Asia joined the world economic community. The act was originally greeted as a great source of demand. But it turned out to be a huge source of supply. Asia is a collection of hard-working, low-cost quantity producers. With China and Asia joining the world economic community, too much merchandise and manufactured goods were produced. The price structure couldn’t hold up. Because of central bank created-inflation, prices were previously driven to extreme overvaluation. The law of “regression to the mean” started to operate. The price of everything in terms of fiat currencies had grown unsustainably high. In the face of Asia’s massive new production, the entire economy of the planet buckled and prices crumbled. With debt at sky-high levels, everything that was leveraged came under pressure (and everything actually was leveraged). The world suddenly faced a process of ruthless deleveraging along with deflation.

Fear of another Great Depression faced the world’s central bankers. The central banks fought the deflationary forces with an increased supply of fiat money while buying up toxic loans and supporting failing corporations. Ex-Wall Streeters, strategically placed, took over, and are currently running the US. Wall Street bailed out and took care of its own. As things stand, the great mass of Americans don’t know what the hell is going on, except that they know that they are losing their jobs and their mortgaged over-priced homes and their life savings.

The battle to save economies goes on. The feared enemy is deflation. How do you conquer deflation? Deflation, by definition, represents an insufficient amount of money dealing with too great a supply of goods. So the Bernanke solution is tried — create trillions in new money. Urge consumers to buy, buy, buy. And bury deflation in a rising tide of fiat money.

But wait — there’s a problem. When you create all this new money you are also creating mountains of debt. How do you pay off this debt? You can renege on it (unthinkable) or you can refinance it (push the pay-off out to as many years into the future as possible) or you can systematically inflate it away. The easiest and time-tested way — inflate it away.

At some point, so much fiat “junk” money is created that people no longer trust it. That’s the situation China is in now, with its $1.7 trillion hoard of US dollar-denominated securities. So what does China do? It decides to swap its US dollars for anything intrinsic. And that means that China is buying commodities, land, mines, corporations, rare earths, gold, anything of intrinsic value with fiat money that it earned from the US. China is very smart. It doesn’t just dump its US securities, which would wreck the market. Instead, it uses its dollars to buy something of intrinsic value. In this way, China solves two problems. It gets rid of dollars, and it buys assets at bargain prices. Assets that it knows it will need in the future.

Maybe you and I should be doing the same thing

Buffalo Gal won’t you come out tonight ,come out tonight, come out tonight…..and dance in the starlit night….. can’t get that song outa my head …..now …what movie was that in…..hmmmm….and why am I unsettled….

NewtoGold, you said cabala, I said K and C (cabala, kabala, ptb-samesimilar)


NewtoGold, I was just abbreviating, sorry

Read the teamlaw “historical” . There is more to it, but it gives a good synopsis.
The players are indicated there without going into the “religion” aspect.

I see it as the attempted destruction and theft of our birthrite, thru manipulation, deceit, grand larceny, bribery, anoulments, and mutiny of the sovereign states.
Fiat currency and nobility titles were paramount in getting this pulled off. Bribes and anoulments have been taking care of the rest.
Gold was the strongman guarding the door that took no bribe and did not debase.

Adrian

Inflation

Bill,
There are three major stories on the wires today talking either of the imminent risk of rampant inflation or the demise of the dollar (also inflation but expressed differently). This does not bode well for the “inflation expectations” of the American people and the behavioral econics theories of Larry Summers, not for manipulation arm of the US Government the Gold Cartel. It does bode well for precious metals……

Buffett: Economy May Mend, But Inflation Will Wound

247wallst.com/2009/08/19/buffett-economy-may-mend-but-deficit-will-wound/

QUOTE

Buffett feels that rising government borrowing will eventually cause inflation………….

The trouble is that, if Buffett is right about the future, it may look like the last 1970s. After a deep recession, caused in part by the Arab oil embargo, monetary stimulus and government spending pushed inflation into the double digits topping out in 1980 at 13.5%. It was a level not seen in decades and one which has not been seen since.

END

The Fed’s lack of a detailed exit plan spurs debate

finance.yahoo.com/news/The-Feds-lack-of-a-detailed-cnnm-3625765013.html?x=0&sec=topStories&pos=7&asset=&ccode=

QUOTE

“The ingredients for runaway inflation down the road remain in place,” said Allen Sinai, chief global economist for Decision Economics. “Right now inflation is quiet, but it’s a sneaky problem, it’s like cancer. It sneaks in and sneaks up and one day the world wakes up and it’s there.”

END

Pimco Says Dollar to Weaken as Reserve Status Erodes

www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aeD0JMxdEA_c

QUOTE

The U.S. government boosted spending and the Federal Reserve bought bonds to revive credit markets that seized up after financial companies posted $1.6 trillion in writedowns and losses, raising concern there is an oversupply of greenbacks……

Holders of dollars should diversify before central banks and sovereign wealth funds do the same because of concern government budget deficits will deepen, Gross said in June.

END

The bogeymen of the deflation scare have gone into self-imposed exile where they belong lest they be lynched by people who can’t even afford pitchforks because of inflation!
Cheers
Adrian…

Bill H

Bill H:

All that is left is (false) confidence.

www.chinadaily.com.cn/china/2009-08/18/content_8582318.htm

To all; China cut its Dollar holdings by $25 billion during the month of June. If you will recall, this was the time period leading up to the “G-2″ meetings between the U.S. and China. This was the time period where several “messages” were issued by China expressing their concern over the safety of their Dollar investments. If we are to learn that July had the same action of divestiture by the Chinese, in my opinion the credit spigot is closed.

If the Chinese stop participating in auctions and have actually turned to sellers then the “buyer of last resort” is the Federal Reserve and the gates of hell have opened. The U.S. cannot function “normally” (whatever that is) without $2 trillion of borrowings above and beyond tax receipts which we know are shrinking. Borrowing from oneself is a great game if your trading partners allow it but it looks as if the Chinese are backing away and saying NO MAS! The potential for everything to stop dead in its tracks and come unglued has ratcheted up another notch to an all time high.

Compound the above with the fact that China is now encouraging it’s citizens to buy Silver (the real stuff, not the fake paper “Made in USA”). China has about 1 1/2 billion citizens within its borders, it will not take much for them to gobble up 500 million ounces (close to the worlds’ above ground inventory or more) at $15 per ounce. The situation in Silver between supply and demand is now more lopsided than any asset in history yet the “specs” see a .50 cent or $1 drop and they start to vomit before they can reach the door, HOW STUPID! I say stupid because it is a rare occurrence when you can find an asset that is in such short supply at the same time central banks are overcreating the currencies to buy said asset. It is only a matter of time.

Will the Fed be able to print and monetize all the debt that the Treasury requires? They would like to but human nature and truth will not allow it. The markets will panic out of nowhere as a signal that US policy is unacceptable to the rest of the world. There are just TOO MANY fuses to be contained. Will it be a big bank(s)? The FDIC itself? A state or states? The Dollar or a failed auction? A force majeur in Silver or Gold (COMEX)? Another fraud? Or maybe someone spills the beans to save their own hide or they have a “come to Jesus” moment. Could it be the Basel III requirements and or mark to market? Israel and Iran? A nuclear event? How about a bad opium crop in Afghanistan (the CIA wouldn’t like this)? What if CIT were to go under and the administration says “so what” like they did with Lehman? Could it be the realization that prime loans and commercial real estate are next to implode? What if Ben Bernanke grabbed his chest in pain (even if it was only gas from a comped lunch)! What if the “presidential dog” ran away from home?

OK, I don’t want to get too stupid here but my point is, IT COULD BE ANYTHING! Or, it could be NOTHING! The system is teetering so delicately between bent over and flat on it’s ass that anything at any time can now cause a panic. It’s inflation, no deflation, back and forth like ping pong. It’s real, no it’s paper, no it’s a Ponzi, does anyone know (really know) what stands behind anything anymore? I’m talking about confidence here, it is the only thing left (false and contrived as it may be) in a world full of deception. How long will confidence last? I don’t know exactly but I do know that you will recognize when it has evaporated. Regards, Bill H.

Inflation

RNo

A lively gut wrenching rollercoaster day down here….we may be inching ever closer to a place to really call home……
Now as everyone is totally fed up with the PM’s ..it is time to run em up the old ladder….Lets roll!

AuGirl (19:26) Funny. You live close enough to the Surrey SPCA to get over there right now to pick up one or both of those friendly lovelies. Good luck and thanks for the funny posting. Equiz.


Greeley bank auction may bury farmers

Today’s sale of failed Greeley bank’s notes “could be devastating”

By Miles Moffeit
The Denver Post

Updated: 08/18/2009 11:53:49 AM MDT

The federal government today will auction off 418 farm loans stranded on the books of failed Greeley-based New Frontier Bank.

The auction is believed to be the largest sale of farm notes since the aftermath of the 1980s savings-and-loan crisis, and it has many Colorado farmers fearful they will lose their property as a result.

Farmers suspect investors or banks will snap up their notes at fire-sale prices, then liquidate their collateral to score a quick profit.

“It could be devastating,” said Bob Winter, a board member of the Colorado Farm Bureau. “That is what’s going to happen with many of the loans. The buyers will take what equity they will get and move on.”

The loans, originally valued at $455 million on the bank’s books, will be auctioned over the Internet by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.

About two-thirds of New Frontier’s farm portfolio was lent to Colorado properties. The rest went to borrowers in 12 other states as far away as Florida. The bank failed in April, and at the time it was the largest bank failure of the year.

The government has estimated that it will lose $1.28 billion on the liquidation of New Frontier’s assets.

The stakes are high, but the auction process is shrouded in secrecy. While out-of-state investors are likely to play the dominant role — Colorado banks have shown little interest in refinancing the loans — no one knows who is bidding, how many bidders will participate or what prices the loans will bring.

If historical FDIC data are a clue, the loans could sell for as low as 50 percent to 75 percent of their original book value.

Most notes in poor shape

The FDIC had planned to auction off $750 million worth of New Frontier’s leftover notes but recently pulled back a third of the package for reasons it has not disclosed.

Most of the notes set for sale are in poor shape, held by dairymen and other farmers hammered by turbulent commodities prices. About 70 percent of the loans are classified as nonperforming — meaning more than 60 days past due at the time of the bank’s closing.

Also, banks apparently have balked at refinancing loans because of questions about the quality of collateral and cash flow. Regulators and lawsuits have faulted New Frontier managers for shoddy risk assessment.

“They (bankers) tend to treat us as if we have a disease,” said Karen Healey, an Eaton cattle farmer who believes her note is being auctioned off but doesn’t know for sure because the FDIC hasn’t notified her.

“I get angry just thinking about picking up the phone to call the FDIC,” she said. “I’ve been here for 11 years; this is where I want to live and work. But I don’t know if I’ll be able to stay.”

Numerous bidders are interested in the auction, having performed due-diligence research, said Merrie Duncan, marketing director for First Financial Network of Oklahoma City, manager of the auction.

Given the scale of the auction and concerns that predatory lenders could join the bidding, the FDIC tightened rules for bidders. They must be banks or sophisticated agricultural lenders, and they must put down a $100,000 deposit.

Tired of uncertainty

The bids are scheduled to be closed out, or given final approval, by the FDIC on Sept. 3. Within days, the winning bidders typically notify borrowers. The FDIC will not publicly post the outcome of all bids for two to three months, Duncan said.

In the meantime, all the farmers can do is wait and hope that their note buyers agree to refinance.

Fort Morgan cattle feedlot owner Gary Teague, a former borrower with New Frontier, said he’s tired of the uncertainty.

Three months after he stood at the center of a county fairgrounds hall tearfully pleading with members of Congress to help his cattle operation and other farms find new financing, no banks have stepped forward.

Despite his never having missed a payment on his multimillion-dollar loan, he said, six banks have refused to refinance it. Amid declining revenues, he’s had to say goodbye to 100 employees, the bulk of his workforce.

“The losses are just tremendous,” Teague said. “The problem now is that we’re in a situation where they (FDIC officials) basically control you. The ramifications of this auction in this part of the state will be almost unheard of. Whoever buys those loans will determine the outcomes of a lot of operations.”

Winedoc - you can be!

My heros have always been Cowboys

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OMko5LelBdA&feature=related

The last Cowboy song

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XbR3K9DEAjI&feature=related

Mama’s don’t let your babies grow up to be Cowboys

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N_a4BU09GrU

Winedoc…Wow

…..Easy to fall in love with Joni Mitchel in 1969

video.google.com/videosearch?q=joni+mitchel&um=1&ie=UTF-8&ei=rZaMSpOnHYHVlAfL59G6CA&sa=X&oi=video_result_group&ct=title&resnum=8#

newtogold @ 19:38 pm

hmm means that stinkin pile of do do looks like it might go up, but that could be a bunch of do do…jmho

Deadeye

Don’t misunderstand what I wrote. If I was in the government and wanted to control the masses, that is a good strategy. Never said I was pro-governmet.  I am just a regular guy from New Jersey who knows too much about the world and all the BS that is going on behind the curtains. Sometimes, I wish I was “blissfully ignorant” of all of it.

Fully: Neil Young and The Musky

A few hours ago, as I moved into exam room 5 to see a sixty something guy, the day was winding down, and as I came in, he was looking up at the Harold White photo you gave me of Neil Young and the Musky…….

He obviously was deep in thought, as he was waiting……..

He said the picture reminded him of being on the road as a youngster, travelling musician, the whole bohemian lifestyle……..

A few months ago he gave me his CD, a compilation of original tunes, a tribute to his sons, at first I didn’t give it a lot of thought even though I appreciated the gift, knowing he was a good family man and all, I had no idea…….

Back to him being in deep thought……..the photo reminded him of tuning up with Joni Mitchell and hanging out playing music from one small town venue to another.

I asked………

she was pretty cool and quite striking, apparently sporting a ukulele

Man, somedays, I wanna be a cowboy

jonimitchell_robinson_300.jpg

Winedoc

Wanka

watched it 3 times and crack up every time…

BTW my friend said the station was inundated with calls to adopt Ginger..I hope the same for the german sheppard

(Newtogold) your: “–Lenin. He was on the mark too.”

Now it is clear where your are comming from. Humbug! Deadeye

Grin

As to your 18:27 response, thanks for the charts but what do they show and what does hmm mean in this case. Reminds of of when I had a class and this one guy used to talk to me about stuff all the time. I would respond with hmm all the time. One day he said to me that my continued hmms was my way of saying nothing at all. He was right. Didn’t care to respond to his dribble. I don’t think your hmm has the same meaning.

augirl 19:26 way too good LOLOL . wj


AuGirl and ez

I think the blending of both your answers leads to the right conclusion. BTW, ez Big K or C, what are they refering to?Augirl, never read that quote from Lenin. He was on the mark too.

Hilarious

Equiz, did you see this on the local news? Puppy love gone wild .. a friend sent me this clip cuz I rarely watch TV . But this is just too funny.

www.vancouversun.com/Video+Puppy+love+gone+wild/1882833/story.html

How the New York Stock Exchange really works

Posted by David Kramer on August 19, 2009 08:34 AM

Richard Ney on the Role of the Specialist

“The story is told that after he had been deported to Italy, Lucky Luciano granted an interview in which he described a visit to the floor of the New York Stock Exchange. When the operations of floor specialists had been explained to him, he said, ‘A terrible thing happened. I realized I’d joined the wrong mob’” (1Ney, 8).

It was with these words that Richard Ney began his first of three books on the nature of the New York Stock Exchange. Ney wrote over 20 years ago, a time when a 750 Dow was high and today’s volumes were beyond imagining. Some of his material is dated, and must be read in the light in which it was written. But the main premise of his books is still true: that the specialist exists not to ensure the free and orderly trade of stock in a particular company, but to fatten upon the innocence and ignorance of the small investor.

The New York Stock Exchange is not an auction market (2Ney, 86), though many investors still hold onto that image. It is a rigged market. Volume is an effect of price. Prices are controlled absolutely by the specialists, the ‘market makers’ in individual stocks. It was this discovery that led Mr. Ney to eventually give us small investors a priceless gift: enlightenment.
“Studying the transactions in each stock, I became immediately conscious that, on too many occasion to be a coincidence, a stock would advance from its morning low and then, often during the afternoon, would show an up-tick of a half-point or more on a large block of anywhere from 1,500 to 5,000 or more shares. This transaction seemed to herald a transformation in what was taking place, for immediately thereafter the stock would begin to drop like Newton’s apple. Before I could find out what caused this, another question presented itself: What caused the same thing to happen at the low point in that stock’s decline? For it was also apparent that a block of stock of the same size often appeared on a down-tick of a half-point or more, after which the stock quickly rallied. Together these two facts seemed to give a stock’s pattern continuity. At the end of several days of investigation, I discovered that these transactions at the top and bottom of a stock’s price pattern were for the specialist’s own account. … Clod that I was, I had at last recognized that, although the study of human nature may not be fashionable among economists, it is never out of season” (2Ney, 9).

The specialist is part of a system. First, he is part of that rare fraternity of men who are all specialists in an exchange. It is a small private club, to whose membership one can only be born. The specialists of the Dow 30 exhibit the spirit of ‘all for one, and one for all’. If one of the 30 is having problems, the other 29 wait for him, before they move onto their next agreed upon campaign (2Ney, 172). The rest of the specialists take their lead from watching the Dow 30.

But the system is more extensive and more powerful than just the specialists. The specialists are the heart of the exchange. The exchange, in turn, has practical control of the major corporations, banks, insurance companies, and brokerage houses in this country. These, in turn, influence news reporting and the regulatory agencies.

ADVANTAGES OF BEING A SPECIALIST
The specialist has many advantages, many tools to use to pry dollars from unsuspecting investors and mutual funds. Chief among these advantages is his book. In his book he can see at a glance all the buy and sell orders from the public and the funds. His book tells him of potentially massive sales above and below his current price. This gives him a great advantage when he is trading on his own investment and omnibus accounts.

Because of his book, the specialist sees shifts in trends long before anyone else. This gives him a great advantage. The specialist will buy heavily at the bottom of a slide (at wholesale) then advance prices and sell, at heavy volume, at the peak of the rally (retail). He will then sell short and take prices down. The turning points of a rally will be marked by heavly volume in the Dow 30 (3Ney, 85-89).

When he desires he can even make large block trades without entering them into his book. In this way the public is never made aware of those trades. Should the specialist want to supply a buy or sell order from his own accounts, rather than from public orders on book, he can and will do so (1Ney, 156). Ney cites specific examples when his customers orders were ignored while the specialist completed orders for his own accounts.

When serving as the market maker, the broker’s broker, the specialist trades from his Trading Account, which is to be used to service the needs of the market. However, he also has Investment Accounts (plural). His Segregated Investment Accounts put him directly into competition with every other investor in his stock. The reason for he has segregated investment accounts is that they enable him to convert regular income into long-term capital gains (1Ney, 113).

In addition, he also trades on Omnibus accounts, taking orders from a friendly bank on behalf of friends, family, and himself (1Ney, 58). Although he is not allowed to be both long and short in his Trading account, he can take the opposite stance in his Investment or Omnibus accounts (3Ney, 130).

A Specialist will often not have any shares in his trading or omnibus accounts. If public demand for shares suddenly increases, the Specialist is more than happy to supply those shares to the public by short selling. This, of course, forces the Specialist to take the price down soon thereafter, so that he may cover his short sales at the lower price. Or, the Specialist may sell from his Investment Accounts, establishing a middle or long term high (1Ney, 61), and then take the price down. Whichever strategy he employs, a large public demand for stock ultimately drives the price of that stock down, not up.

Distribution of large amounts of stock can be done from the specialist’s trading account, usually as short sales. The trading account can then be covered by transferring stock from the long-term investment accounts into the trading account (1Ney, 64).

The existence of the specialist’s Investment and Omnibus Accounts is ultimately detrimental to the public. “In a stock with only a small capitalization or floating supply, the segregation of large blocks into long-term investment accounts for the specialist further decreases the supply of the stock available to the public” (1Ney, 61)

The specialist has absolute control over price. He can match the buys with the sells in any way he sees fit. He can raise the price of the stock 3 points in three trades, and open the next day down 5.

The seeming unpredictability of stock prices is due to the fact that prices exist at the whim of the specialist. A stock is only worth what the specialist is willing to pay for it at the moment. The fluctuations you see are, in fact, the evidence of how the specialist is working out his inventory problems to meet his short-term, intermediate-term, and long-term goals (2Ney, 172). The specialist will sometimes ‘leap frog’ his prices up or down, creating a gap. This is done to keep a group of investors from buying or selling at a particular price. ‘Leap Frogs’ show specialist intent.

Ney offers specific examples where specialists opened stocks considerably lower:
August 8, 1967 Chicago and Northwestern Railroad opened down 39 points.
October 21, 1968 one of the preferred stocks of TRW opened down 28 points.
February 4, 1970 Memorex opened down 29 1/2 points (1Ney, 15)

“With $8,000, you can buy $10,000 worth of stock, but with $8,000 in stock, any Stock Exchange member can buy $160,000 worth of stock for his own segregated investment account” (1Ney, 112).

Because most investors have margin accounts, and the margin account agreement allows their brokers to lend their shares, specialists have an unlimited number of shares to borrow and sell short (1Ney, 68).

Margin agreements also allow the broker to use their customer’s shares as collateral without the customer’s knowledge or permission. This practice is fraught with dangers. In November, 1963, the Ira Haupt brokerage firm (NYSE), which dealt in both stocks and commodities was caught unwittingly in a scheme by one of its commodities customers to leverage nonexistent salad oil. The failure wiped out the partners of the firm and left it owing some $37 million in debts. “To compound Haupt’s and the New York Stock Exchange’s problems, it was impossible to return the stock to customers because the stock (held by the brokerage firm for its customers) had been pledged to banks by Haupt” (1Ney, 122).

Margin accounts usually allow the broker to borrow any cash in the account to use for his own purposes at no interest, even to lend back to the customer for margin purchases, at interest (1Ney, 119).

At the bottom of a cycle of a stock, having panicked customers into selling, the brokers and specialist borrow the customers’ money to make their own long-term purchases; using their advantageous margin to acquire large amounts of stock. At the top of the cycle the process is reversed. Customers are paid back their money by the brokers and the specialist selling their shares to customers at a profit. The insiders even have extra cash to loan customers for margin purchases (1Ney, 136).

Another powerful tool for the specialist is the short sale. Though the specialist is responsible for 85 percent of the short selling done in a stock, the Exchanges are loathe to print any timely data on specialist short sales (2Ney, 94)(3Ney, 234). The specialist uses the short sale to control both downward and upward movements of stock (3Ney, 88).

The private investor or mutual fund can only sell short on an up- tick. The up-tick rules serves only to trap the public into selling short at the bottom, as the specialist drives the price down without a single up-tick for the public’s use (1Ney, 72). But the specialist need not even create an up-tick to sell short. The SEC has been careful not to publicize its rule 10a-1(d), in which sub-paragraphs (1) through (9) exempt the specialist from the up-tick rule (2Ney, 97)(3Ney, 126, 215).

The Securities Exchange Act of 1934 prohibits pegging, the act of artificially holding a stock’s price at a certain level for the advantage of the person or persons doing the pegging. However, SEC rule X-9A6 (1940) allows pegging by specialists in order to ‘maintain an orderly market’ while a large-block distribution of shares is taking place (2Ney, 117).

THE CORPORATION, THE SPECIALIST, AND THE EXCHANGE
The specialists and brokers hold shares “in street name” for investors, and therefore can vote the proxies for those shares. Officers in a corporation must report to the SEC any trading they do in the shares of their own company. Yet the Specialist reports his profits in trading the shares in that same corporation to no one (1Ney, 54-55).

The specialist, one of his partners, a friendly broker, their lawyers, or their bankers, often sit on the company’s board of directors, which makes the specialist privy to information before the average trader. Where an officer of a corporation is held strictly accountable to the SEC for his use of ‘inside information’, the specialist and fellow brokers are accountable to no one (1Ney, 54-55).

“It is an ideal situation. When you control a corporation’s proxies, everyone is sympathetic to your point of view and your choice of directors. This is the other reason why nearly every major corporation listed with the Exchange (NYSE, M.T.) has a broker or a broker’s banker on its board. It gives the exchange a pipeline to that corporation” (1Ney, 90).

Large brokerage houses, large banks, and the New York Stock exchange use dummy corporations as fronts to hold large portions of stocks in corporations. A list from any large corporation of its largest stockholders will be a roll of these very dummy corporations, who show up on list after list of major stock holders in America’s largest corporations (2Ney, 19-23).

The intertwining of interests runs even deeper when the relations of Wall Steet’s top Law firms are examined. For example, in 1974 the New York Stock Exchange’s legal counsel also represented Chase Manhattan Bank. Both entities, through their dummy corporations, were large stockholders in scores of major U.S. corporations (2Ney, 26).

THE EXCHANGE, THE SEC, THE FEDERAL RESERVE, AND THE WHITE HOUSE

“The bankers’ man, Senator Carter Glass, who steered the Federal Reserve Act through Congress in 1913, had maintained that the Federal Reserve banks would be merely ‘lenders of money.’ The only collateral they were to accept was notes that could be paid when, in the course of business, goods and services had been manufactured and distributed. However, almost from the day of its inception, the Federal Reserve System set about making loans on common stocks” (1Ney, 103).

Who sits on the Federal Reserve Board? … Chief officers of banks and corporations, all of whose companies are controlled by the Exchange (1Ney, 103-105).

Billions, perhaps trillions of dollars worth of stocks are now held by banks as collateral for loans. This too works to the advantage of the specialists. For, to protect their interests, banks will issue stop orders to sell the stock before it falls below a certain price. The specialist holds those stop orders in his book and therefore knows exactly where a large number of shares can be had, and at what price they can be purchased. One quick sweep down those ranges of prices will deliver to the specialist the inventory he desires for short and mid-term purposes (1Ney, 101).

On June 30, 1934 President Roosevelt appointed Joseph Kennedy to be the first Chairman of the SEC. Only 4 months before, Kennedy, along with Mason Day, Harry Sinclair, Elisha Walker, and others were found to be responsible for operating ‘pools’ that were actively manipulating stock. When these, “poolsters withdrew and the boom collapsed the administration denounced the men who operated them” (1Ney, 215). But what’s a little denouncement between friends?

The stock markets had been headed downhill since December of 1968. On May 26, 1969 a party was held at the Nixon White House. In attendance were John Mitchell, Maurice Stans, Peter Flannigan, thirty five guests from Wall Street, fourteen industrialists, seven bankers, five heads of mutual and pension funds, and two heads of insurance companies. The next day a bull rally began on Wall Street. May 27th saw the Dow Jones 30 average rise by 5 per cent in one day (2Ney, 71).

On April 17, 1971, President Nixon, who along with Attorney General Mitchell had been a Wall Street lawyer (Maurice Stans was a broker), appeared for photographs with friends from the New York Stock Exchange. Nixon recommended the public to invest in the market. By April 28th the market was in a steep decline. Nixon circulated, “to 1,300 editors, editorial writers, broadcast news directors, and Washington bureau chiefs a list of the stocks of ten corporations that had advanced during the past year” (2Ney, 32).

There is a revolving door between the exchange and Washington. SEC Chairmen ‘retire’ to go to work for the Exchanges or major brokerage houses at many times their government salaries (2Ney, 50-63). SEC Chairman Hamer Budge was found by Senator Proxmire’s investigation to be making frequent trips to Minneapolis to confer with officials of IDS. IDS was under investigation at the time by the SEC. After leaving the SEC, Budge took the position of Chairman of the Board with IDS (2Ney, 56).

NEWS AND FINANCIAL REPORTING
It is highly unlikely that we will see news reports critical of U.S. stock exchanges, or of the specialist system. There is a simple reason for this. All news organizations are corporations and do but reflect their management’s views. Corporations that own media have specialists influencing the choice of management. Newspapers, magazines, and television are but extensions of the corporate world.

When Richard Ney’s first book, The Wall Street Jungle, came out it was on the New York Times best seller list for 11 months. Yet the New York Times would not review it. The Wall Street Journal refused to take an ad from a New York bookstore that featured The Wall Street Jungle (2Ney, 30).

All three of the major networks were wary of having Ney appear. NBC banned only two people from appearing on the Tonight show with Johnny Carson: Ralph Nader and Richard Ney. Not only do large banks, brokerage firms, and corporations advertise on television, they also are the largest stock holders (2Ney, 33- 34).

SPECIALIST STRATEGY
The specialist should be thought of as a merchant with some rather unique inventory problems and opportunities. His goal, always, is to buy at wholesale prices and to sell at retail. This applies to his actions in the course of trading day as well as a year of trading.

At the bottom of a slide the specialist will buy heavily for his trading, investment, and omnibus accounts. His goal then becomes to raise the price of his stock with his wholesale inventory intact. In practice, though, he may have to sell shares to meet public demand. This will cause him, then, to lower the price to re-accumulate his inventory before he can proceed to higher levels.

A rally begins while the price of the average stock is still falling. “Major rallies begin and end with the unexpected,” (3Ney, 184).

To stimulate public demand for his stock, near the high the specialist will raise the angle of the rising prices dramatically for the stock. True to one of Ney’s axioms that prices beget volume, the public will rush into the market place at the rally high. The specialist can now sell his accumulated inventory to fill the increased demand. Heavy Dow 30 volume at the high is evidence of heavy short sales by the specialists (3Ney, 113).

When the specialist has sold all his inventory, and has sold short, he will then begin a downward slide of prices so necessary to his plans. Slides are a mirror of rallies. Near the bottom, the specialist will increase the angle of price decline, alarming investors, scaring them into selling their shares to the specialist who needs them to cover his short sales, and to build a new inventory at wholesale. The media will remain bullish, or cautiously optimistic throughout a slide, until the last two weeks, when they will turn suddenly bearish (3Ney, 158).

TIPS FROM RICHARD NEY:
Specialists in the most active stocks will require more time than their fellow specialists to move stocks up or down, or to cover at the top of a rally or the bottom of a slide (2Ney, 84-85).

Specialists may use a rally as a ’stalking horse’ for a later rally. Price is used like a geiger counter to locate volume (3Ney, 149).

During the typical bear market, or slide, the specialists will usually bring prices up on Fridays, to keep investors hopes alive (2Ney, 92).

Leaders of the rally in the Dow 30 will often act as ’screens’ for the price declines of the other 24 or 25 Dow stocks.

Each stock exhibits its own distinct pattern or rhythm of price behavior (2Ney, 189).

THINGS OF WHICH TO BE AWARE
How can you spot the nadir of each high and low? Ney says to look at volume very closely. In particular look at the volume of the individual Dow 30 Industrial stocks (2Ney, 171). Get to know these specialists’ habits. Follow what they do. Patterns of behavior will emerge.

Ney emphasized that a sense of timing was critical for survival in the market (2Ney, 149).

Ney was convinced that detecting Specialist short selling was a key. Specialist short selling at the peak of a rally should be detectable through increased volume.

Richard Ney used charts extensively. Ney was quick to point out that what is really being measured in his charts is not the behavior of the masses in the marketplace, but the techniques of the specialist in an individual stock as he maneuvers to solve short-term, intermediate-term, and long-term inventory problems (1NEY, 259).

Ney points to the gaps in prices that develop when a specialist is trying to ‘catch up’ with the market. These gaps, be they up or down, signal specialist intent (2Ney, 172).

“Investors assume that what happens in the economy or to the corporation in terms of earnings or sales determines the trend of stock prices. … The most misleading element in this type of analysis is that it ignores the basic needs and motivations of the specialist system” (2Ney, 150).

We, as consumers react to certain critical numbers. Specialists know this. Specialists use the 10’s (10, 20, 30, etc.) and 5’s (5, 15, 25, etc.) in their strategies. They will use these numbers to elicit heavier buying or selling from the public. Often too, though, they will avoid critical numbers to avoid buying or selling stock when they do not wish to do so (2Ney, 155-156 & 163).

NEY’S SMALL INVESTOR TRADING RECOMMENDATIONS (1Ney, 297-301)
1. Do not buy the acknowledged leader in a field. Buy the number 2 or 3 company. These companies are more likely to be subject to bull raids by the specialists (1Ney, 298).
2. “Nothing puzzles me more than an investor’s willingness to pay more than fifty dollars a share for stocks. Buy low priced stocks. It’s percentages you’re after and you’ll get them in these stocks in a bull market” (1Ney, 298).
3. Invest only in stocks listed on the NYSE.
4. Do not buy secondary offerings from your broker.
5. Buy only stocks whose prices have fallen at least 35 to 50 percent.
6. “The rule, ‘Cut your losses and let your profits ride,’ was invented by a broker” (1Ney, 298).
7. The average investor need not worry about tax brackets, so do not hesitate to sell at a profit. “A short-term gain is better than a long-term loss” (1Ney, 299).
8. Own your stock. Do not use margin.
9. Do not sell short.
10. Do not allow your stock to be borrowed (via a margin account; M.T.)
11. Credit balances should be immediately transferred to your bank.
12. Do not leave your stock with your broker in street name.
13. Invest only in growth oriented, not income, stocks.
14. 4 to 5 stocks in a portfolio is plenty.
15. Make arrangements with your bank to receive your stock.
16. If there has been a major advance from the summer lows, look for the public to begin selling 6 months hence.
17. Big block sales at the end of a run-up (usually marked by heavy volume) marks the imminent decline in price.
18. Look for bull raids in May, up from the April 15th tax low.
19. Never enter stop or limit orders.
20. If you are interested in a stock, learn its specialist’s habits.
21. Stocks that are ideal for bull raids are those that decline as close as possible to an angle of 45 degrees.

Works Cited:
1Ney, Richard. THE WALL STREET JUNGLE, fifth printing. New York: Grove Press, Inc., 1970.
2Ney, Richard. THE WALL STREET GANG, third printing. New York: Praeger Publishers, Inc., 1974.
3Ney, Richard. MAKING IT IN THE MARKET. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1975

[The source for this essay is here. I posted my version of the entire essay because I edited out comments that the author Michael Templain made that I disagreed with, i.e., I felt he didn’t grasp fully what Ney had written. You can read the original essay for yourself in order to make up your own mind. If you decide to read the books, read them in chronological order. They are impossible to find in a library, and are very expensive to buy used.]