floridagold (21:48) So what is it you actually do with those numerous guns? Do you

shoot each other? Like shooting anyone you see that you dont like or who disagrees with your viewpoint? Or do you just shoot yourself? If the latter is the goal of owning all those guns, given the current population of the U.S of A. is there by any chance an oversupply of guns in your country? Some economists suggest that oversupply brings prices down. I guess I just dont get it about gun inventory. Cheers. Equiz. p.s. to put your mind at ease I also dont get it about natgas inventory in the U.S. at present.

All is Forgiven Bernie

just as WC FIELDS quipped “any man that hates kids and dogs can’t be all bad “  Any guy that that sticks it to Hanoi Jane can’t be ALL bad either ..!!

What goes around …………….

WHICH WOULD YOU RATHER HAVE ?

zillion.jpg

OR

gold_maple_leaf_coin-image1.jpg

they’re rocking and rolling in Asia

http://finance.yahoo.com/intlindices?e=asia

Club 

Massive economic suffering and a billion guns is a very dangerous mix!

They may own the politicians. They may own the regulators. And they may simply own most of America. However, they don’t own the billion or so guns currently in the possession of an increasingly angry American population.

Massive economic suffering and a billion guns is a very dangerous mix!

http://seekingalpha.com/article/157732-colonial-bank-failure-highlights-the-problem

Goldrunner

Thank you

Fully …That company does look pretty darn good…Osisko

Irish………..

Only had a couple of minutes to talk to his brother, but it seems like he said in “Northwest Belize”, but he squinted his eyes when he said it.  Seems like the company his brother works for is some aggregate company that might be more than a small operation.  That is all I know from the two minute conversation.  I’ll see what I can find out.

Equiz…Osisko…OSK

…..I see that one as a big winner going forward….I plan to buy some Monday

…..Incredible…they are picking up homes and moving them to another location….and the Home owners are On side with that

Goldrunner

Well how about that …try to find out where he is and who he is an I will contact him…Plus I just was offered a connection to the right guys for the Placencia air strip construction ..I have no idea how much crap goes into a major airfield but ..aggggrrr the Jamacian…I still have not corraled him …what a stupid spot to be in between on this situation…
Thanks……

An interesting discussion of “overpaying executives”

www.wilmott.com/blogs/satyajitdas/index.cfm/2009/8/23/Greed–The-Other-Seven-Deadly-Sins

Stolen from another site………….Jackson Hole Fed……

The Fed is trying to force inflation higher…………Duh.

http://www.reuters.com/article/ousiv/idUSTRE57K5LL20090822

Irish………

Talking to the guy who I have dealt with for dental supplies since 84, his brother is in Belize and is involved with some company that sounds like it is into rock quarries.  That is all the info I had time to ask about, for whatever it is worth.

So, old Hanoi Jane gets it “in the end”…hahahaahahaaaa. Couldn’t have happened to

a nicer person (and I use the term loosely)

cannuck

Good eyes buddy….McAffee heh…..not bad company …I have spnt the entire hot hot day in meetings trying like blazes to solidify my position down here….one guy I was with has been here 18 years and still has a house that seems to be only blocks away from AuGirl…Jesus it was hot down here ….lets get gold moving tonight …love ya all

Samb………….a couple of notes.

1) Armstrong never factored in (out) Dollar Inflation from his historical work.  Dollar inflation affects/ effects the look of the charts tremendously leaving tops and bottoms in different places on the charts…………..think “value.”  Thus, though all of his work was based off of the “stock markets”, he doesn’t know “what will top or bottom” at his cycle tops or bottoms………..his words.  So, he suggested maybe the Dollar would top recently.  That is because it is the supply/ demand for the Dollar that is swamping the supply demand for the stocks he based his work on.  He never removed the second variable that can swamp the supply/ demand curve for stocks before he did his work.  Thus, since we are in a period of Dollar inflation like the 70’s where the economy was weak, we can use that period for the “cycle”, but since the Dollar inflation is much, much higher now, the Dow could go much higher if the Dollar Inflation is high enough…….and the Dow and Gold could even meet at new highs……..or even much higher highs. 

Thus, Armstrong’s work can/ will be correct in terms of the “time component” of the cycles to a large extent, but his work cannot be correct in terms of “price” unless the psychology of the markets is grossly following his work. 

2)  From the equivalent of the Deflation Scare lows of late 08/ early 09, it was the PM explorers that really took off in the late 70’s.  Why?  Well, the valuations of “reserves” were most dramatically affected by the rising PM pricing- at least compared to the rise in price for the producers.  A rise in Gold from say 750 to 5,000 is a 6.67 bagger increase for a producer, but the producer also has to deal with a rising cost factor as the commodities also rose in that period (though not as aggressively as the PMs.)  Yet, the rise in prices for reserves were bigger on a percentage basis from the collapsed low at that bottom to the top…………and there was a massive move of inferred resources to reserves as lower grades moved up to the reserve camp so that a “good explorer” may have had reserves double or more along with the valuation rises.

Thus, as far as I can tell by looking at the few PM stocks from the late 70’s that I can find, the best explorers rose pretty well non=stop from the equivalent of the 08 DS low to the top and beyond in a true parabola.  The true explorers had no “drag” from rising costs, and as the parabola moved higher they probably had no problem getting financing (their major negative going into the deflation scare) as investors flooded into the PM sector.  Just take one look at China suddenly doing massive deals for resource stocks as we approach the time period for take-off.  For China, the “gloves have suddenly been taken off.” 
Some were saying during the depths of the deflation scare that without Dollar inflation being created through the FRB system there would not be enough “velocity of money” to create rising prices.  Our argument was that as things like the Bond market fell, along with foreign countries trying to abandon the Dollar, there would be a tsunami of money velocity………actually in many currencies.  As Deadeye correctly says, the Bond market is the largest market in the world.

As I have long held due to the cycle, 2010 will usher in the start of the more aggressive parabola for the PMs with the move being firmly in place by mid-2010 to late 2010………but I defined that as Gold moving up through 1450 to 1500.  The move will start before that with the analogy to the late 70’s being a move up through 1,000, then a final re-test of the “old highs.” 

Greetings, Australians and New Zealanders. Combined with Canada the three of

us Commonwealthers collectively poll more votes as a better place to live than rural U.S. during financially difficult times - at least that is what FGC`s current exit poll statistics suggest. I am not surprised. Cheers, all. Equiz.

In Canada they move parts of towns to dig for gold. We do not yet own this stock. Cheers. Equiz.

mineweb.com/mineweb/view/mineweb/en/page31?oid=87827&sn=Detail

redneckokie1

I hope he spent every penny of her money.

bernard madoff

has one investor which i personally am ecstatic that he took to the cleaners. that person is non other than the b!tch who committed treason during the viet nam war. that’s correct, non other than hanoi jane herself. way to go bernie.

rno

deadeye — roger that my friend…give um hell.

is there any way to post the press report and pic?  is your newspaper on line? best of cheer. wj

(Wanka your 18:26) Debate is over —

(Wanka, Almost your exact 18:26 post at a town health care meeting last Thur. Got the biggest applause of the night and my picture on the front page of the local paper.
“Debate is over, Congress must have the exact same plan they pass. No loopholes.”

(Husker your 16:18) I must agree.

Richard, you must have forgotten a few “impossible” things Israel has done: six day war, Entebbe rescue in 1976. When guts, self preservation and fighting for “right” - the good guys win whatever the cost. The US did that in WWII but all you kids are too young to remember that. Deadeye

floridagold –as for health care i have the answer…

all the debate over national health care can be solved by 2 short sentences to the politicos that are wondering why the people are so very pissed off and finagling all kinds of ways to ‘SELL’ thier rape rack and ruin!

1) we the people will accept the exact same health care plan you in the congress, the senate and the white house have period no compromise.

2) you in the congress, the senate and the white house give up your health care plan and accept the exact one your trying to shovel on we the people period no compromise.

stick to your guns and shout to the rooftops ‘i’m mad as hell and the friggen debate is over’ we except nothing less.

try any more screw jobs on we the people and its pitchforks, torches and lamp post time.

jeeze now wasn’t that easy?  wj

Irish - you have company coming… Rise of the Super-Rich Hits a Sobering Wall

by David Leonhardt and Geraldine Fabrikant
Friday, August 21, 2009

provided by
The New York Times

super-rich.jpg
Chris Richards for The New York Times
John McAfee is auctioning off this property in New Mexico to pay bills. His worth has fallen to about $4 million from a peak of about $100 million.


The rich have been getting richer for so long that the trend has come to seem almost permanent.

They began to pull away from everyone else in the 1970s. By 2006, income was more concentrated at the top than it had been since the late 1920s. The recent news about resurgent Wall Street pay has seemed to suggest that not even the Great Recession could reverse the rise in income inequality.

But economists say — and data is beginning to show — that a significant change may in fact be under way. The rich, as a group, are no longer getting richer. Over the last two years, they have become poorer. And many may not return to their old levels of wealth and income anytime soon…..

—snip—

He has sold a 10-passenger Cessna jet and now flies coach. This week his oceanfront estate in Hawaii sold for $1.5 million, with only a handful of bidders at the auction. He plans to spend much of his time in Belize, in part because of more favorable taxes there.

—snip—

Whole Article here…

it just gets better n better…wonder if the congressional slimers will for-go thier cola?—-

for the good of the country of course!   :mrgreen: wj